Notícias
Publicada pauta da sessão de julgamento da próxima quarta-feira (07/02). Confira!
Quatro casos serão apreciados durante a 223ª reunião do Tribunal AdministrativoCompartilhe:
Compartilhe por Facebook Compartilhe por Twitter Compartilhe por LinkedIn Compartilhe por WhatsApplink para Copiar para área de transferência
Publicado em 01/02/2024 08h28
Foi publicada, no Diário Oficial da União desta quinta-feira (01/02), a pauta da próxima sessão de julgamento do Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Cade). A 223ª Sessão Ordinária de Julgamento acontecerá na quarta-feira (07/02), às 10h, com transmissão pelo YouTube.
Ao total, quatro casos serão apreciados, sendo um processo administrativo, dois embargos de declaração e um inquérito administrativo.
Confira a pauta de julgamento:
1. Processo Administrativo nº 08700.009165/2015-56
Representante: Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica ex officio.
Representados: Elster Medição de Água S/A, FAE Ferragens e Indústria de Hidrômetros S/A, Itron Soluções para Energia e Água Ltda./Accell Soluções para Energia e Água Ltda., LAO Indústria Ltda., Sappel do Brasil Ltda./Diehl Metering Indústria de Sistema de Medição Ltda., Sensus Metering Systems do Brasil Ltda., Saga Medição Ltda., Vector Sistemas de Medição Ltda. e pessoas físicas.
Relator: conselheiro Victor Oliveira Fernandes
2. Embargos de Declaração do Processo Administrativo nº 08700.004974/2015-71
Embargantes: Conselho Regional dos Corretores de Imóveis da 14ª região – CRECI-MS, Sindicato dos Corretores de Imóveis no Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul – SINDIMÓVEIS-MS, Sindicato de Habitação de Mato Grosso do Sul – SECOVI/MS.
Interessados: Conselho Federal de Corretores de Imóveis – COFECI; do Conselho Regional dos Corretores de Imóveis da 23ª Região – CRECI/PI; do Conselho Regional dos Corretores de Imóveis da 18ª Região – CRECI/AM-RR; do Conselho Regional dos Corretores de Imóveis da 3ª Região – CRECI-RS, do Conselho Regional dos Corretores de Imóveis da 6ª Região – CRECI-PR e demais pessoas jurídicas.
Relator: Conselheiro Gustavo Augusto
3. Embargos de Declaração do TCC nº 08700.006166/2023-59
Embargante: HNK BR Indústria de Bebidas Ltda.
Interessada: Ambev S.A.
Relator: presidente Alexandre Cordeiro
4. Inquérito Administrativo nº 08700.003510/2021-96
Representante: Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica ex officio.
Representados: Andrade Gutierrez Engenharia S.A., CCI Construções Ltda. (“CCI”), Construcap CCPS Engenharia e Comércio S.A. (“Construcap”), Construções e Comércio Camargo Corrêa S.A. (“Camargo Corrêa”), Construtora Queiroz Galvão S.A. (“Queiroz Galvão”), Estacon Engenharia S.A. (“Estacon”).
Relator: conselheiro Gustavo Augusto
Subsidy Advice Unit: Proposed approach to monitoring under the Subsidy Control Act 2022
From:Competition and Markets Authority and Subsidy Advice UnitPublished1 February 2024Get emails about this page
Summary
This consultation seeks views on the approach proposed by the Subsidy Advice Unit (SAU) in undertaking its monitoring function as set out in section 65 of the Subsidy Control Act 2022.
This consultation closes at
Consultation description
Under section 65 of the Subsidy Control Act 2022, the SAU is required to monitor and review the effectiveness of the operation of the Act; and the impact of the Act on competition and investment within the UK. The SAU must publish a report on the outcome of its review.
This consultation provides an explanation of, and requests views on, the SAU’s proposed approach to carrying out this monitoring function.
Documents
Approach to monitoring consultation
HTML
Approach to monitoring consultation
PDF, 385 KB, 20 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.Request an accessible format.
Ways to respond
Email to:
Share this page
The following links open in a new tab
Published 1 February 2024Get emails about this pagePrint this page
Explore the topic
Is this page useful?
- Yesthis page is useful
- Nothis page is not useful
Report a problem with this page
Services and information
- Benefits
- Births, death, marriages and care
- Business and self-employed
- Childcare and parenting
- Citizenship and living in the UK
- Crime, justice and the law
- Disabled people
- Driving and transport
- Education and learning
- Employing people
- Environment and countryside
- Housing and local services
- Money and tax
- Passports, travel and living abroad
- Visas and immigration
- Working, jobs and pensions
Government activity
- Departments
- News
- Guidance and regulation
- Research and statistics
- Policy papers and consultations
- Transparency
- How government works
- Get involved
Support links
- Help
- Privacy
- Cookies
- Accessibility statement
- Contact
- Terms and conditions
- Rhestr o Wasanaethau Cymraeg
- Government Digital Service
All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated
Merger inquiry outcome statistics
Statistics showing the outcomes of merger inquiries examined under the Enterprise Act 2002.From:Competition and Markets AuthorityPublished7 May 2014Last updated1 February 2024 — See all updatesGet emails about this page
Documents
Merger inquiry outcome statistics
ODS, 6.87 KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format
Details
These figures detail the outcomes of all merger inquiries completed in each year, from 1 April 2004 to the latest full month.
Please note that decisions up to and including 31 March 2014 were given by the Office of Fair Trading and the Competition Commission. Decisions on or after 1 April 2014 were given by the Competition and Markets Authority.
More information about overall UK merger activity is available from the Office for National Statistics’s quarterly statistical bulletin on mergers and acquisitions involving UK companies.
EDPR notifica a aquisição do controlo exclusivo sobre a EDPR PE.
Ficha do processo
Statement Regarding the Termination of Amazon’s Proposed Acquisition of iRobot
Tags:
In response to the announcement that Amazon and iRobot have terminated their $1.4 billion merger agreement, Federal Trade Commission Associate Director for Merger Analysis Nathan Soderstrom issued the following statement:
“We are pleased that Amazon and iRobot have abandoned their proposed transaction. The Commission’s probe focused on Amazon’s ability and incentive to favor its own products and disfavor rivals’, and associated effects on innovation, entry barriers, and consumer privacy. The Commission’s investigation revealed significant concerns about the transaction’s potential competitive effects. The FTC will not hesitate to take action in enforcing the antitrust laws to ensure that competition remains robust. I would like to thank the Northeast Regional Office, which handled the investigation, and the entire FTC team, for their work on this matter.”
The lead staff attorneys on this matter were Jonathan Platt and Geralyn Trujillo in the Northeast Region.
The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about consumer topics and report scams, fraud, and bad business practices online at ReportFraud.ftc.gov. Follow the FTC on social media, read our blogs and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.
Contact Information
Media Contact
Office of Public Affairs
Casos
CADE
Ato de Concentração nº 08700.000453/2024-36
Requerentes: Fundo de Investimento em Participações Multiestratégia Embraer Investimento no Exterior e XMobots Holding S.A. Advogados: Luis Nagalli, Julia Haddad Niemeyer, Bruno Oliveira Maggi e outros. Decido pela aprovação sem restrições.
Ato de Concentração nº 08700.000055/2024-10
Requerentes: TR10 Empreendimentos Imobiliários Ltda., TRX Real Estate Fundo de Investimento Imobiliário e Leroy Merlin Companhia Brasileira de Bricolagem. Advogados: Cristiano Diogo de Faria, Michelle Sobreira Ricciardi, Rafael Cirino da Silva e Renato Augusto Coltro. Decido pela aprovação sem restrições.
Ato de Concentração nº 08700.000262/2024-74
Requerentes: Estrela Comércio e Participações S.A. e Lokamig Rent a Car Ltda. Advogados: Luis Nagalli, Julia Haddad Niemeyer e Carolina Furlani. Decido pela aprovação sem restrições.
Ato de Concentração nº 08700.005505/2023-80
Requerentes: Janssen-Cilag Farmacêutica Ltda., Laboratório Farmacêutico do Estado de Pernambuco Governador Miguel Arraes S.A. e Nortec Química S.A. Advogados: André Marques Gilberto, Natali de Vicente Santos Kapulskis e Sarah Rafaela Silva Fida Carneiro. Com fulcro no §1º do art. 50 da Lei nº 9.784, de 1999, integro as razões do Parecer nº 48/2024/CGAA5/SGA1/SG (SEI 1341098) à presente decisão, inclusive quanto à sua motivação. Nos termos dos arts. 13, XII, e art. 57, I, da Lei nº 12.529, de 2011, decido pela aprovação sem restrições do presente ato de concentração.
Ato de Concentração nº 08700.000439/2024-32
Requerentes: Altamura Fundo de Investimento em Participações Multiestratégia e RK8 SPE Empreendimentos e Participações Ltda. Advogadas: Joyce Honda e Isabela Oliveira. Decido pela aprovação sem restrições.
Ato de Concentração nº 08700.000343/2024-74
Requerentes: Três Tentos Agroindustrial S.A. e FWA 158 Geração de Bioenergia S.A. Advogados: Eduardo Caminati, Marcio Bueno e outros. Decido pela aprovação sem restrições.
CMA
- Asda / Arthur (Co-op) merger inquiry
- 1 February 2024
- Competition and Markets Authority case
- Daily Mail and General Holdings Limited / News Corp UK & Ireland Limited merger inquiryThe CMA is investigating the anticipated joint venture between Daily Mail and General Holdings Limited and News Corp UK & Ireland Limited in respect of their newspaper printing activities in Great Britain.
- Updated: 1 February 2024
Comissão Europeia
PSP / MACQUARIE / ART / LSSA / LSWA
Merger
Last decision date:31.01.2024 Super simplified procedure
ORANGE / MASMOVIL / JV
Merger
Last decision date: 31.01.2024
Ongoing
Investigation phase:2
FTC
EduTrek, LLC
The Federal Trade Commission has charged a telemarketing operation and its owners with making millions of illegal, unsolicited calls about educational programs to consumers who submitted their contact information to websites promising help with job searches, public benefits, and other unrelated programs.
In early September 2023, a federal judge in Illinois ruled in the FTC’s favor, finding that the defendants made millions of illegal, unsolicited calls to consumers on the Do Not Call Registry. In granting summary judgment, the court found that the FTC was entitled to both injunctive relief and civil penalties and has scheduled a hearing to determine the amount of the civil penalty award and the scope of injunctive relief.
A federal district court entered final orders against a telemarketing company and its owners, who made millions of illegal, unsolicited calls to people that were registered on the Do Not Call Registry. The court ordered the defendants to pay $28.7 million in civil penalties and permanently banned the defendants from participating in telemarketing or assisting and facilitating others engaged in telemarketing to consumers.
Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
January 31, 2024
FTC Matter/File Number
152 3126